This segregated fund currently invests primarily in companies anywhere in the world through the AGF Global Dividend Fund.
Is this fund right for you?
- A person who is investing for the longer term.
- Seeking the growth potential of foreign stocks.
- Comfortable with low to moderate risk.
Risk Rating
How is the fund invested?
(as of June 30, 2025)
Asset allocation (%)
|
Name |
Percent |
|
US Equity |
60.0 |
|
International Equity |
36.3 |
|
Income Trust Units |
2.3 |
|
Cash and Equivalents |
1.4 |
Geographic allocation (%)
|
Name |
Percent |
|
United States |
60.0 |
|
United Kingdom |
8.8 |
|
Switzerland |
7.0 |
|
Japan |
5.5 |
|
Hong Kong |
4.1 |
|
Germany |
2.8 |
|
Ireland |
2.6 |
|
France |
2.5 |
|
Korea, Republic Of |
1.5 |
|
Other |
5.2 |
Sector allocation (%)
|
Name |
Percent |
|
Financial Services |
20.3 |
|
Technology |
16.3 |
|
Industrial Goods |
12.6 |
|
Consumer Goods |
12.0 |
|
Healthcare |
12.0 |
|
Energy |
6.1 |
|
Consumer Services |
5.1 |
|
Telecommunications |
5.1 |
|
Industrial Services |
3.9 |
|
Other |
6.6 |
Growth of $10,000
(since inception)
Data not available based on date of inception
Fund details
(as of June 30, 2025)
Top holdings |
% |
Microsoft Corp |
5.5 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co |
4.8 |
Abbvie Inc |
4.4 |
Broadcom Inc |
4.2 |
Waste Management Inc |
3.9 |
TJX Cos Inc |
3.8 |
Visa Inc Cl A |
3.7 |
Shell PLC |
3.6 |
Philip Morris International Inc |
3.2 |
Mondelez International Inc Cl A |
3.2 |
Total allocation in top holdings |
40.3 |
Portfolio characteristics |
|
Standard deviation |
12.7% |
Dividend yield |
2.4% |
Average market cap (million) |
$649,168.2 |
Understanding returns
Annual compound returns (%)
1 MO |
3 MO |
YTD |
1 YR |
{{snapShot.Return1Mth|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.Return3Mth|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.ReturnYTD|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.Return1Yr|customNumber:1}} |
3 YR |
5 YR |
10 YR |
INCEPTION |
{{snapShot.Return3Yr|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.Return5Yr|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.Return10Yr|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.ReturnInception|customNumber:1}} |
Calendar year returns (%)
2024 |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
{{snapShot.Return1YrCalendar|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.Return2YrCalendar|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.Return3YrCalendar|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.Return4YrCalendar|customNumber:1}} |
2020 |
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
{{snapShot.Return5YrCalendar|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.Return6YrCalendar|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.Return7YrCalendar|customNumber:1}} | {{snapShot.Return8YrCalendar|customNumber:1}} |
Range of returns over five years
(August 1, 2018 - June 30, 2025)
Best return |
Best period end date |
Worst return |
Worst period end date |
12.4% |
March 2025 |
-1.0% |
Sept. 2023 |
Average return |
% of periods with positive returns |
Number of positive periods |
Number of negative periods |
5.4% |
83.3% |
20 |
4 |
Q1 2025 Fund Commentary
Market commentary
Global equities were volatile in the first quarter of 2025, as investors reacted to shifting trade dynamics, geopolitical uncertainty and rapid technological change. The Trump administration’s tariffs on key trade partners, including China, Canada and the European Union, sparked renewed fears of a global trade war. In response, many major central banks adopted a cautious stance, pausing further interest-rate cuts.
The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (Fed) held its benchmark interest rate steady at 4.25%–4.5%, signaling concern over inflation risks. Manufacturing activity fell driven by lower new orders and the largest rise in input prices in over two and a half years. U.S. equities delivered mixed performance, rising in January, but falling because of expectations of sustained high interest rates and tariff-driven inflation.
The European Central Bank (ECB) cut its refinancing rate from 3.4% to 2.65%, responding to a slowdown in inflation and weaker economic activity. Eurozone manufacturing showed signs of recovery, driven by output growth and a slowdown in job cuts. European equities rose in the latter half of the quarter because of positive corporate earnings and Germany’s announcement of an infrastructure spending initiative.
Japanese equities were positive, supported by positive earnings, share buybacks and optimism around new artificial intelligence investments. However, gains slowed in February and March as a stronger yen and trade policy uncertainty weighed on market sentiment.
Performance
The Fund’s relative exposure to AbbVie Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc. had the most positive impact on performance. AbbVie benefited from its immunology drugs, which offset its Humira patent expiration. Philip Morris stock rose, driven by sales of smoke-free products.
Relative exposure to Broadcom Inc. and Eaton Corp. PLC was negative for performance. Broadcom was affected by regulatory uncertainties, particularly in China, and rising research and development expenses. Eaton’s revenue fell short of expectations, partly driven by operational challenges, including supply chain disruptions.
At the sector level, stock selection in information technology, energy and consumer staples had a positive impact on the Fund’s performance. Underweight exposure to information technology also had a positive impact. Stock selection in communication services, consumer discretionary and materials had a negative impact on performance. Underweight exposure to communication services and overweight exposure to materials also had a negative impact.
At a regional level, stock selection in the U.S. and Netherlands had a positive impact on the Fund’s performance, as did exposure to Czech Republic. Selection in the U.K. and France, and exposure to South Korea had a negative effect on performance.
Portfolio activity
The sub-advisor added Alphabet Inc. and increased Shimadzu Corp. A holding in Shinhan Financial Group Co. Ltd. was sold and Broadcom Inc. was reduced.
Outlook
The sub-advisor’s outlook for the U.S. economy is less certain with the anticipation of tariffs and trade wars and possible stagflation. While the Fed’s monetary policy has brought inflation closer to its 2% target, potential disruptions from trade policies and immigration restrictions could create challenges. These factors may dampen economic activity, especially in labour markets and supply chains.
Tax reform and deregulation could help stimulate economic growth, particularly in domestic and cyclical sectors. However, the risk of stagflation, where inflation remains elevated while economic growth stalls, could challenge the broader economic picture. Tariffs and tighter immigration controls are expected, though their extent will likely be limited by the inflation outlook. On balance, these policy measures could bolster business confidence, driving growth in private assets and capital markets, but also introduce considerable volatility and uncertainty.
In Europe, trade uncertainties and the imposition of tariffs weigh heavily on economic conditions. The ECB has responded by adjusting its deposit rate to offset the impact of these pressures. The U.K., facing sluggish productivity growth, labour constraints and inflation from higher taxes, is in a similar position. The Bank of England is adjusting interest rates modestly to support the economy.
In China, the property market collapse and deflationary pressures are adding to economic challenges. The Chinese government’s response has been more reactive than proactive, which presents potential risks to its economic future.